January 1, 2014 and people are flocking to the health exchanges to find cheap health coverage because the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has promised "Affordable Health Care". According to the ACA, affordable means the cost will be no more than 9.5% of income. If it is higher than 9.5% there will be tax credits and/or subsidies given to make it affordable.
Interestingly, the cost of a person who is 64 years old cannot be any higher than 3 times the cost of a 20 year old. In other words, the cost for older people, who use on average 5 times the amount of health care than a 20 year old, would pay less while the 20 year old will pay more, than in our current market. In addition, if you are a smoker, your premium can be up to 50% more than a non-smoker at the same age level. The question is, if I am a smoker and paying 50% more than a non-smoker making it unaffordable for me, will I get a subsidy even though if I wasn't a smoker it would be affordable? Since the smoking surcharge is considered a penalty, the answer seems to be no.
Since coverage in the exchanges will be guaranteed issue, it seems that younger, healthier people will find cheaper coverage elsewhere while older, sicker people will flock to it. If this happens it won't be long before the exchanges implode and/or we are taxed even more to supplement the deficit.
Monday, January 28, 2013
Friday, January 4, 2013
YOU NEED TO TELL YOUR EMPLOYEES ABOUT THE EXCHANGES, MARCH 2013
According to the Affordable Care Act (Health Reform), by March 2013 all employers must notify their employees of the existence of the Maryland Health Benefits Exchange. In addition they will need to provide:
- Written
notice informing employees about the state’s Exchange, including a
description of how the employee may contact the Exchange for assistance.
- Notification
to employees if the plan offered by the employer is inadequate, meaning it
does not meet the actuarial value of 60 percent. The employer must let
employees know that they may be eligible for a premium tax credit and a
cost-sharing reduction if they purchase a health plan through the
Exchange.
- Employers must notify employees that if they purchase a health plan through the Exchange, the employee may lose the employer’s contribution to health benefits offered by the employer.
The Maryland Health Benefit Exchange will begin enrollments into their plans October 2013 for a January 1, 2014 effective date. Brooks Benefit Services will be forwarding verbiage for this notification to all of our clients. In addition we will be able to assist any employees with determining whether the exchange plans may or may not be a good fit for them. It is important to remember that the exchanges are available to all employees whether they are full-time or part-time.
The Maryland Health Exchange is going to be made up of several plans: Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum and a Catastrophic plan for younger people. These plans will be underwritten by current carriers and will basically compete with themselves. Since the coverage through the exchange is guaranteed issue, many believe most of our sickest and oldest individuals will jump or be pushed into these plans. Since the cost of these plans is directly relative to the individuals income, it could make more sense to go with an exchange plan than one through an employer and visa-versa. Depending upon the size of the employer (50+ Full-Time Employees), if the employee goes to the exchange, your plan is deemed to either be "un-affordable" or isn't "minimal essential coverage", you will be fined.....heavily.
If any of this is new to you or needs further conversation, please do not hesitate to contact our office at 410-239-5009.
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
NEW HEALTH REFORM FEES COMING!!??
More fees are coming to pay for health reform AKA Affordable Care Act. Listed below are fees that are in place or going to be in place soon to pay, in some part, the cost of health reform.
- Patient Centered Outcomes Research Fee (PCORI) Fee: (This fee is also known as the comparative effectiveness fee. Most understand this to be where doctors tell us if the procedure we need is cost effective. The fee is $1 per member per year in 2012 then moved to $2 per member per year the second and then will be adjusted each year until 2019 when its supposed to dissolve. Which seems unlikely.)
- Transitional Reinsurance Fee: (Fees collected from Health Issuers and Third Party Administrators to distribute funds to carriers with non-grandfathered plans that attract individual at risk for high medical costs). Again, penalize the people who try to maintain a healthy lifestyle. In effect from 2014-2016
- Insurer Fee: Goes into effect in 2014 and is permanent. (This fee funds premium tax subsidies for individual and families with household incomes between 100 and 400 percent of Federal Poverty Level who purchase health insurance through the exchanges.) This fee will be approximately 2.3% of premium the first year.
In total you can expect your premium to increase approximately 3.8% in 2014 just because of the above fees. This isn't the end though. I am sure there are more to follow once they have been dug out of this law.
Thursday, September 20, 2012
YOU NEED TO KNOW THIS! DETERMINING YOUR FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES
IRS Notice 2012-58 is aimed at employers with more than 50 full-time employees and solidifies how employers are to determine whether an employee is full-time or part-time. A full-time employee, for health reform purposes, is defined as someone who works, on average, 30 hours or more per week. This number is important for several reasons but mainly if you should be offering them health coverage and if they could count against you if you are penalized for either not offering minimal essential coverage or if your health plan is deemed unaffordable.
Often-times employers will bring employees on board as a part-time employee and through shift changes or picking up hours here and there become full-time but still labeled part-time. The IRS is going to be looking at these employees very closely as to whether they should have been considered full-time. The way they are going to do this is specified in the link above but a synopsis is located below:
Ongoing Employees (Safe Harbor)
1) For ongoing employees (employees who have been working for at least one standard measurement period), employers "Look-Back" over a period of "Standard Measurement" of at least 3 months but no more than 12 Calendar months to determine average weekly hours.
2) Those employees who average more than 30 hours during this "Standard Measurement Period" or "Look-Back Period" are considered full-time. Employers may take an (Optional) "Administrative Period" of no longer than 90 Days to bring them into full-time benefits.
3) Following the Look-Back Period", starts the "Stability Period" which is at least 6 months long and no shorter than the "Standard Measurement Period". During the stability period the employee remains either Part-Time or Full-Time based on their determination, even though they may have moved back into Part-Time or Full-Time status.
Newly Hired Employees, Variable and Seasonal (Safe Harbor)
1) Similar to ongoing employees, Employers may use an initial "Measurement Period" of at least 3 months but no more than 12 months to determine average hours, and an (Optional) administrative period of no more than 90 days to bring that employee on board as full-time eligible if they meet the Full-Time criteria.
2) The "Stability Period" must be the same length as the "Stability Period" for ongoing employees.
3) The rules for the "Stability Period" are the same for Newly Hired and Ongoing Employees.
This requirement under health reform appears to be aimed at those 50+ employers who are thinking that they may be able to avoid penalties associated with not offering minimal essential coverage or unaffordable coverage by hiring more part-time employees. The fed needs their penalty income to pay for health reform so one way or another they will get it. Unless you plan on bringing a part-time employee on full-time, keep them under 30 hours per week to avoid any potential fines.
Often-times employers will bring employees on board as a part-time employee and through shift changes or picking up hours here and there become full-time but still labeled part-time. The IRS is going to be looking at these employees very closely as to whether they should have been considered full-time. The way they are going to do this is specified in the link above but a synopsis is located below:
Ongoing Employees (Safe Harbor)
1) For ongoing employees (employees who have been working for at least one standard measurement period), employers "Look-Back" over a period of "Standard Measurement" of at least 3 months but no more than 12 Calendar months to determine average weekly hours.
2) Those employees who average more than 30 hours during this "Standard Measurement Period" or "Look-Back Period" are considered full-time. Employers may take an (Optional) "Administrative Period" of no longer than 90 Days to bring them into full-time benefits.
3) Following the Look-Back Period", starts the "Stability Period" which is at least 6 months long and no shorter than the "Standard Measurement Period". During the stability period the employee remains either Part-Time or Full-Time based on their determination, even though they may have moved back into Part-Time or Full-Time status.
Newly Hired Employees, Variable and Seasonal (Safe Harbor)
1) Similar to ongoing employees, Employers may use an initial "Measurement Period" of at least 3 months but no more than 12 months to determine average hours, and an (Optional) administrative period of no more than 90 days to bring that employee on board as full-time eligible if they meet the Full-Time criteria.
2) The "Stability Period" must be the same length as the "Stability Period" for ongoing employees.
3) The rules for the "Stability Period" are the same for Newly Hired and Ongoing Employees.
This requirement under health reform appears to be aimed at those 50+ employers who are thinking that they may be able to avoid penalties associated with not offering minimal essential coverage or unaffordable coverage by hiring more part-time employees. The fed needs their penalty income to pay for health reform so one way or another they will get it. Unless you plan on bringing a part-time employee on full-time, keep them under 30 hours per week to avoid any potential fines.
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
HEALTH REFORM (PPACA) COMPLIANCE....SAVE THE DATE!!
So here we are, on the heels of a presidential election, a bit over a year away from the full effects of the Affordable Care Act (Health Reform) and employers need to make sure they are remaining compliant or it could cost, a lot. Below is a time-line and essential changes that you may want to earmark. In past posts I have shared these with you but thought were important enough for a re-visit.
2012
1) August, 2012-Rebates will be issued by insurers if medical loss ratio is less than 80% in small group market and 85% in large group market. Rebates will be issued at the employer level.
2) August, 2012-Non-Grandfathered Health plans will be required to offer coverage for Gestational Diabetes Screening and Contraceptive for non-religious, non-exempt employers.
3) Summary of Benefits Coverage (SBC)-Applies to first Open Enrollment period after September 23, 2012. Insurers and Plan Administrators must provide a summary of benefits and coverage to employers and plan participants. For employer groups the responsibility to get these to the employees relies primarily on the employer. Under this provision, there is a 60 Day Advance Notice of Material Change where carriers must provide a 60 day advance notification if any material changes to the coverage are to go into effect.
4) October, 2012-Comparative Effectiveness Fee-Plans that began after 10-2-2011 will be required to pay $1 per covered life for research to determine effectiveness of medical treatments. This is the portion of the law that concerned a great many people as they believed that these panels would undermine life saving care in place of cost savings. This fee goes up to $2 per life in 2013 and supposedly goes away in 2019.
5) Jan, 2013-Flexible Spending Account (FSA) spending limits capped at $2500 for Individual and $5000 for family. Cap applies to plan years that began after December 31, 2012.
6) 2012 Tax Year-W-2's distributed in 2013 for tax year 2012 for employers who issue more than 250 W-2's will be required to include the total cost of group medical coverage.
2012
1) August, 2012-Rebates will be issued by insurers if medical loss ratio is less than 80% in small group market and 85% in large group market. Rebates will be issued at the employer level.
2) August, 2012-Non-Grandfathered Health plans will be required to offer coverage for Gestational Diabetes Screening and Contraceptive for non-religious, non-exempt employers.
3) Summary of Benefits Coverage (SBC)-Applies to first Open Enrollment period after September 23, 2012. Insurers and Plan Administrators must provide a summary of benefits and coverage to employers and plan participants. For employer groups the responsibility to get these to the employees relies primarily on the employer. Under this provision, there is a 60 Day Advance Notice of Material Change where carriers must provide a 60 day advance notification if any material changes to the coverage are to go into effect.
4) October, 2012-Comparative Effectiveness Fee-Plans that began after 10-2-2011 will be required to pay $1 per covered life for research to determine effectiveness of medical treatments. This is the portion of the law that concerned a great many people as they believed that these panels would undermine life saving care in place of cost savings. This fee goes up to $2 per life in 2013 and supposedly goes away in 2019.
5) Jan, 2013-Flexible Spending Account (FSA) spending limits capped at $2500 for Individual and $5000 for family. Cap applies to plan years that began after December 31, 2012.
6) 2012 Tax Year-W-2's distributed in 2013 for tax year 2012 for employers who issue more than 250 W-2's will be required to include the total cost of group medical coverage.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS COVERAGE (SBC)...IT'S ON YOU
Under PPACA (Health Reform), you as an employer, starting with your first open enrollment period after September 23, 2012, will be required to issue a Summary Of Benefits Coverage (SBC) to all health plan participants. This is an approximate 4 page (front and back) document explaining the key benefits and coverage of the employer plan(s). In most cases the insurance carrier will provide either copies or a link to a file in PDF format in order to download and distribute. According to PPACA, the responsibility to distribute the SBC to plan participants lies with the employer group. This is not to say, that at some point, carriers may decide to simply issue these directly to the plan participants as a courtesy to their clients.
Thursday, August 16, 2012
COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS FEE (TAX?)
Starting in October 1, 2012 employers will pay $1 per participant on your health plan per year to fund Comparative Effectiveness Research. The dollars will go to the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund and will fund a new organization call the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). This amount will increase to $2 per participant per year in 2013.
The idea behind the fee or tax is that these dollars will go to conduct comparative effectiveness research of various medical interventions and publicly disseminate them. Whether or not this fee will go to fund decisions on your personal healthcare is yet to be seen.
The idea behind the fee or tax is that these dollars will go to conduct comparative effectiveness research of various medical interventions and publicly disseminate them. Whether or not this fee will go to fund decisions on your personal healthcare is yet to be seen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)