Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Carefirst Receives Approval for Individual Medical Plan Rate Increases

The Maryland Insurance Administration released the approved rates for CareFirst Consumer Direct medical plans on Tuesday August 29, 2017. The approved increase for the BlueChoice HMO is 34.5% and the approved increase for the BlueCross PPO plans is 49.9%. This comes on the heels of an approximate 25% rate increase last year. The new rates will go into effect beginning 1-1-18.  Expect plan changes as well.

Companies who moved to individual plans due to high cost in the group market, it may be time to move back. 

Thanks,


Ben

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Evergreen Receivership Conference Call

August 22, 2017

Today we spent an hour with the Maryland Insurance Administration, Attorney for the Maryland Attorney Generals Office, Insurance Commissioner Al Redmer and spokespeople for the receivers of Evergreen Health.

Since insurance companies can't go bankrupt, they go into receivership.  The receivers will run the company with one main goal in mind, to protect the consumer.  There are not going to be any renewals with Evergreen or new business written.

Many of your employees have received letter indicating that HMO's are not covered under the Guarantee Fund.  This is correct.  However they are protected under court order and Maryland Statute.

Claims that were being processed before the Receivers took over (Around 8-1) are put on the back-burner and paid at the discretion of the Receivers. Some may never be paid.   Claims after 8-1 are given priority and paid first.  According to the Court Order, page 7, section 13, providers are not allowed to balance bill you, try to seek payment from you for claims submitted beyond your normal co-pay and/or refuse to see you.  Those that are, are violating the court order.  

Also, here are a list of FAQ's regarding the Receivership of Evergreen.

We have been in touch with each and every Evergreen client and are planning a strategy to best work with this situation that makes sense for your firm.  

As always, please feel free to contact me at 410-239-5009.

Respectfully,

Ben

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Senate to take up bill to repeal Obamacare without replacement plan

WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced late Monday that the Senate will give up on its bill to replace Obamacare and vote instead on legislation to repeal the law within two years.
McConnell made the decision after it became clear he could not win enough support from his own GOP senators to pass the latest version of a replacement bill.
Two Republican senators announced Monday night that they would vote against the revised Senate bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, leaving leaders without enough support to bring the bill to the floor.
McConnell responded that he will push the Senate to pass a bill that would repeal the Affordable Care Act – with a two-year delay – as a substitute.
"Regretfully, it is now apparent that the effort to repeal and immediately replace the failure of Obamacare will not be succesful," the Kentucky Republican said in a statement. "So, in the coming days, the Senate will vote to take up the House bill with the first amendment in order being what a majority of the Senate has already supported in 2015 and that was vetoed by then-President Obama: a repeal of Obamacare with a two-year delay to provide for a stable transition period to a patient-centered health care system that gives Americans access to quality, affordable care." 
Contributing: Erin Kelly, USA TODAY

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Maryland Looking At High Premium Increases On Exchange As Cigna Drops Out

The Baltimore Sun  (6/21, Cohn) reports Cigna Health and Life Insurance Co. has decided to not sell plan on the exchange next year as CareFirst BCBS is proposing an average increase of 52 percent for its plans sold on the exchange. The other two remaining insureres on the Maryland exchange, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan and Evergreen Health, are seeking increases of about 25 percent and 65 percent respectively. The requested rate increases were made at a hearing held by the Maryland Insurance Administration.

These increases are being sought by insurance companies through the State of Maryland for Individual Medical Plans both on and off of the exchange.

Friday, May 5, 2017

Who Gets Hurt and Who Gets Helped if Obamacare is Repealed

The legislation, titled the American Health Care Act, now moves to the Senate, where it will likely change a lot when or if it lands on President Trump's desk. But it's already possible to identify who will get helped and who will get hurt by the bill.

The legislation calls for providing refundable tax credits based on a person's age and income. It allows states to waive some protections for those with pre-existing conditions, while letting insurers charge higher rates to older consumers and levy a 30% surcharge on the premiums of those who let their coverage lapse.

The bill also eliminates the enhanced federal match for Medicaid expansion starting in 2020 and curtails federal support for the entire Medicaid program, which covers about one in five Americans. And it lifts the taxes that Obamacare had imposed on the wealthy, insurers and companies.

Republican lawmakers and supporters say the bill will lower premiums and deductibles and give consumers more control over their health care. But an array of opponents, including many consumer and patient advocacy groups, say this bill could leave millions facing higher health care bills and less coverage.

Here's whom the American Health Care Act would likely help:

Younger Americans could get cheaper plans
Obamacare was designed so that younger policyholders would help subsidize older ones. That would change under the Republican bill because it would allow insurers to charge older folks more.  This means that younger Americans would likely see their annual premiums go down. Enrollees ages 20 to 29 would save about $700 to $4,000 a year, on average, according to a study by the Milliman actuarial firm on behalf of the AARP Public Policy Institute.  Those under age 30 would also get a refundable tax credit of up to $2,000 to offset the cost of their premiums, as long as their income doesn't exceed $215,000 for an individual.

The GOP tax credits would also likely be more generous than Obamacare's subsidies for these folks. For example, a 27-year-old making $40,000 a year would receive $2,000 under the GOP plan, but only gets a $103 subsidy from Obamacare, on average, a Kaiser analysis found.

Also, the bill keeps the Obamacare provision that lets young adults up to age 26 stay on their parents' insurance plan.

The healthy could buy less expensive policies in some states
Obamacare requires insurers to provide an array of health care benefits, including maternity, mental health, prescription drugs and substance abuse. This comprehensive coverage, however, jacks up premiums and provides services that some consumers find unnecessary -- think, a couple in their late 50s who aren't having any more kids likely don't need maternity coverage.
The bill would allow states to waive this federal mandate, which would allow insurers to offer skinnier plans that offer fewer benefits with lower premiums.

Middle class and higher-income Americans could get tax breaks and perks
The Republicans would enable people higher on the income scale to claim the tax credit to help pay their premiums. Under Obamacare, an enrollee who makes more than $47,500 is no longer eligible for a premium subsidy. The GOP plan would let a policyholder making up to $75,000 claim the full tax credit. The benefit would phase out slowly until the enrollee hits $215,000 in income.

The legislation also would eliminate two taxes that Obamacare levied on the wealthy to help pay for the law. Under the Affordable Care Act, single taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000 annually have to pay an additional 0.9% Medicare payroll tax on the amount they earn above these thresholds. These taxpayers may also be hit with a tax surcharge of 3.8% on investment income above those thresholds.

And the bill would allow folks to contribute more to Health Savings Accounts, which are primarily used by better-off Americans who can afford to sock money away for health care expenses.

Here's whom the American Health Care Act would likely hurt:

Lower-income folks could be left uninsured
Obamacare contains many provisions to help poor and lower-income Americans.
Primarily, it expanded Medicaid to cover adults who earn up to $16,400 a year. The American Health Care Act would end the enhanced federal Medicaid funding for new enrollees starting in 2020. And it would curtail federal support for the entire program by sending a fixed amount of money per enrollee or by providing a block grant. States would likely have to either reduce eligibility, curtail benefits or cut provider payments.  All this could hurt not only poor adults, but also low-income children, women, senior citizens and the disabled.  Also, Obamacare provides those with incomes just under $30,000 with generous subsidies to lower their deductibles and out-of-pocket costs in individual market policies. The legislation would eliminate the subsidies.  Finally, the premium tax credits the legislation would provide would not go as far Obamacare's subsidies for lower-income consumers

Folks making $20,000 a year would take the biggest hit at any age under the GOP plan, a Kaiser study found. A 27-year-old earning this amount would only get $2,000, instead of $3,225 under Obamacare, on average. Meanwhile, a 40-year-old would get $3,000 versus nearly $4,150. However, the biggest loser would be a 60-year-old, who would receive only $4,000, instead of nearly $9,900 under Obamacare.

In its review of an early version of the bill, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that 24 million fewer people would have coverage by 2026 as compared to current law. The majority of those would have qualified for Medicaid under Obamacare.
Major health insurance lobbying groups are concerned about the bill's impact on all these folks, many of whom are their customers.

"The American Health Care Act needs important improvements to better protect low- and moderate-income families who rely on Medicaid or buy their own coverage," Marilyn Tavenner, CEO of America's Health Insurance Plans, said after the bill passed the House Thursday.

Older Americans could have to pay more
Enrollees in their 50s and early 60s benefited from Obamacare because insurers could only charge them three times more than younger policyholders. The bill would widen that band to five-to-one. That would mean that adults ages 60 to 64 would see their annual premiums soar 22% to nearly $18,000, according to the Milliman study for the AARP. Those in their 50s would be hit with a 13% increase and pay an annual premium of $12,800.  Also, the GOP bill doesn't provide them with as generous tax credits as Obamacare. A 60-year-old making $40,000 would get only $4,000 from the Republican plan, instead of an average subsidy of $6,750 from the Affordable Care Act, according the Kaiser study.  States could also receive waivers to allow insurers to charge older Americans even more than five times the premiums of the young.

Those with pre-existing conditions could be charged more and get less coverage
States could allow insurers to charge higher premiums to those with pre-existing conditions who let their coverage lapse. These states would have to set up high-risk pools or other programs to help lower the costs of insuring these folks, but many experts say the $138 billion set aside through 2026 for that funding would not be enough.

Consumers with health issues may also find that their policies don't cover all of their needs. That's because states could allow insurers to offer skimpier plans. It's likely many carriers would take them up on that offer since few would want to sell policies that attract the sickest and costliest patients.

CNNMoney (New York)

First published May 4, 2017: 9:10 PM ET

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Comparative Effectiveness Research Fee in 2017

Information about the Comparative Effectiveness Research Fee in 2017

The Affordable Care Act imposes an annual fee called the Comparative Effectiveness Research Fee (CERF) on insurers and plan sponsors of self-insured coverage to help fund the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. This information includes a brief review of CERF to help answer your questions and prepare you for this year’s payment.

2017 CERF Payment Details
The fee is based on the average covered lives for the applicable 12-month policy or plan year, and is paid using IRS Form 720 by July 31 each year for the plan year that ended in the preceding calendar year. It’s important to remember that employers must use their ERISA plan year if it is different from the renewal date. The fees for 2017 are:

Plan Year Start DateFee Per Average Covered Life
Feb. 1, 2015–Oct. 1, 2015
Nov. 1, 2015–Jan. 1, 2016
$2.17
$2.26

Who Is Responsible for Paying?
  • The Insurance Carrier pays the fee for insured plans (including guaranteed cost, shared returns, and minimum premium plans), and it is built into premiums.
    • Health Reimbursement Accounts (HRAs) and certain Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) are considered self-funded group health plans. The Insurance Carrier will pay the fee for the underlying medical policy only; clients are responsible for the HRA/FSA related fee.
  • Self-funded plans (including level funding and graded preferred plans) must calculate and pay their own fee.

Monday, March 27, 2017

GOP Fails To Get Enough Support For American Health Care Act

Friday GOP House leaders were unable to get the support needed to move the American Health Care Act forward.  Seeing the "writing on the wall", President Trump withdrew the AHCA and is now focused on Tax Reform.  "Obamacare will remain the law of the land", said Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.  With that said, employers with over 50 employees should continue as usual, complying with the rules, regulations and reporting required under the Affordable Care Act.  Hopefully lawmakers can make changes to the ACA helping business owners by removing fines, penalties and burdensome reporting required each year under the current Health Care Law.