Showing posts with label Transition Relief. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Transition Relief. Show all posts

Friday, March 9, 2018

Transition Relief for Non-Qualifying HSA's

As you know, the state of Maryland passed legislation adding Male Sterilization as part of preventive care.  In doing so it disqualified ALL HSA participants in funding their HSA's for 2018.  Scrambling to get this corrected the Maryland Insurance Administration contacted the IRS for determination and relief.  Finally the IRS has offered transition relief until 2020.  Therefore, you are free to fund your HSA's for 2018.  Please see below and highlighted area at the end:



Notice of Transition Relief Regarding the Application of Section 223 to Certain Health Plans Providing Benefits for Male Sterilization or Male Contraceptives

Notice 2018-12


PURPOSE
This notice clarifies that a health plan providing benefits for male sterilization or male contraceptives without a deductible, or with a deductible below the minimum deductible for a high deductible health plan (HDHP) under section 223(c)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), is not an HDHP under current guidance interpreting the requirements of section 223(c)(2) of the Code. This notice further provides transition relief for periods before 2020 during which coverage has been provided for male sterilization or male contraceptives without a deductible, or with a deductible below the minimum deductible for an HDHP.
BACKGROUND
Section 223 of the Code permits eligible individuals to deduct contributions to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs).[1] Among the requirements for an individual to qualify as an eligible individual under section 223(c)(1) is that the individual be covered under an HDHP and have no disqualifying health coverage. As defined in section 223(c)(2), an HDHP is a health plan that satisfies certain requirements, including requirements with respect to minimum deductibles and maximum out-of-pocket expenses.
Generally, under section 223(c)(2)(A), an HDHP may not provide benefits for any year until the minimum deductible for that year is satisfied. However, section 223(c)(2)(C) provides that “[a] plan shall not fail to be treated as a high deductible health plan by reason of failing to have a deductible for preventive care (within the meaning of section 1871 of the Social Security Act, except as otherwise provided by the Secretary).”[2] Therefore, an HDHP may provide preventive care benefits as defined for purposes of section 223 without a deductible, or with a deductible below the minimum annual deductible otherwise required by section 223(c)(2)(A) of the Code. To be a preventive care benefit as defined for purposes of section 223, the benefit must either be described as preventive care for purposes of the SSA or be determined to be preventive care in guidance issued by the Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Notice 2004-23 (2004-15 I.R.B. 725) and Q&As 26 and 27 of Notice 2004-50 (2004-33 I.R.B. 196) provide guidance issued by the Treasury Department and the IRS regarding preventive care benefits that an HDHP may provide without satisfying the minimum deductible requirement of section 223(c)(2)(A). Notice 2004-23 clarifies that preventive care generally does not include any service or benefit intended to treat an existing illness, injury, or condition.
Notice 2004-23 also explains that state law requirements do not determine whether health care constitutes preventive care under section 223(c)(2)(C). State insurance laws often require health insurance policies and similar arrangements subject to state regulation to provide certain health care benefits without regard to a deductible or on terms no less favorable than other care provided by the health insurance policy or arrangement. However, the determination whether a health care benefit that is required by state law to be provided by an HDHP without regard to a deductible is “preventive” for purposes of the exception for preventive care under section 223(c)(2)(C) is based on the standards set forth in guidance issued by the Treasury Department and the IRS, rather than on how that care is characterized by state law.
Notice 2004-23 further indicates that the Treasury Department and the IRS are considering the appropriate standard for determining preventive care under section 223(c)(2)(C) and, in particular, whether any benefit or service should be added to the list of preventive care benefits and services set forth in Notice 2004-23 or other guidance.
Notice 2004-50, Q&A 27, provides that drugs or medications are preventive care when taken by a person who has developed risk factors for a disease that has not manifested itself or become clinically apparent, or to prevent the reoccurrence of a disease from which a person has recovered.
Section 1001 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010) (Affordable Care Act), added section 2713 to the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) requiring non-grandfathered group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group and individual health insurance coverage to provide benefits for certain preventive health services without imposing cost-sharing requirements.[3] The Affordable Care Act also added section 715(a)(1) to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and section 9815(a)(1) to the Code to incorporate the provisions of part A of title XXVII of the PHS Act, including section 2713 of the PHS Act, into ERISA and the Code. Guidance under section 2713 of the PHS Act is published jointly by the Treasury Department and the Departments of Labor and Health and Human Services.
Under section 2713(a)(1) of the PHS Act, evidence-based items or services constitute preventive health services if they have in effect a rating of A or B in the current recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) with respect to the individual involved. Also, preventive health services under section 2713(a)(4) of the PHS Act include, “with respect to women, such additional preventive care and screenings not described in paragraph (1) [concerning the USPSTF A or B rated recommendations] as provided for in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration” (HRSA). HRSA guidelines generally provide for coverage of all Food and Drug Administration approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling for all women with reproductive capacity. The guidelines, however, do not provide for coverage of benefits or services relating to a man’s reproductive capacity, such as vasectomies and condoms. (78 FR 8456 (Feb. 6, 2013) at 8458 n. 3.)
Notice 2013-57 (2013-40 I.R.B. 293) provides that any item that is a preventive service under section 2713 of the PHS Act will also be treated as preventive care under section 223(c)(2)(C) of the Code.
The Treasury Department and the IRS are aware that several states have recently adopted laws that require certain health insurance policies and arrangements to provide benefits for male sterilization or male contraceptives without cost sharing.[4] Some individuals in those states are participants or beneficiaries in insured health plans or other arrangements subject to the state’s insurance laws. Certain stakeholders have asked the Treasury Department and the IRS whether benefits for male sterilization or male contraceptives constitute preventive care for purposes of section 223(c)(2)(C).
ANALYSIS
Under section 223(c)(2)(C), “preventive care” means (1) preventive care within the meaning of section 1871 of the SSA, and (2) preventive care as otherwise provided for by the Treasury Department and the IRS. Benefits for male sterilization or male contraceptives are not preventive care under the SSA, and no applicable guidance issued by the Treasury Department and the IRS provides for the treatment of these benefits as preventive care within the meaning of section 223(c)(2)(C). Accordingly, under current guidance, a health plan that provides benefits for male sterilization or male contraceptives before satisfying the minimum deductible for an HDHP under section 223(c)(2)(A) does not constitute an HDHP, regardless of whether the coverage of such benefits is required by state law. An individual who is not covered by an HDHP with respect to a month is not an eligible individual under section 223(c)(1) and, consequently, may not deduct contributions to an HSA for that month. Similarly, HSA contributions made by an employer on behalf of the individual are not excludible from income and wages.
TRANSITION RELIEF
The Treasury Department and the IRS are aware that certain states require benefits for male sterilization or male contraceptives to be provided without a deductible, and that individuals have enrolled in health insurance policies and other arrangements that otherwise would qualify as HDHPs with the understanding that coverage for male sterilization or male contraceptives without a deductible did not disqualify the policies or arrangements from being HDHPs. The Treasury Department and IRS also understand that certain states may wish to change their laws that require benefits for male sterilization or male contraceptives to be provided without a deductible in response to this notice, but may be unable to do so in 2018 because of limitations on their legislative calendars or for other reasons. Until these states are able to change their laws, residents of these states may be unable to purchase health insurance coverage that qualifies as an HDHP and would be unable to deduct contributions to an HSA.
Accordingly, this notice provides transition relief for periods before 2020 (including periods before the issuance of this notice), to individuals who are, have been, or become participants in or beneficiaries of a health insurance policy or arrangement that provides benefits for male sterilization or male contraceptives without a deductible, or with a deductible below the minimum deductible for an HDHP. For these periods, an individual will not be treated as failing to qualify as an eligible individual under section 223(c)(1) merely because the individual is covered by a health insurance policy or arrangement that fails to qualify as an HDHP under section 223(c)(2) solely because it provides (or provided) coverage for male sterilization or male contraceptives without a deductible, or with a deductible below the minimum deductible for an HDHP.

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
The Treasury Department and the IRS continue to consider ways to expand the use and flexibility of HSAs and HDHPs consistent with the provisions of section 223. Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on the appropriate standards for preventive care under section 223(c)(2)(C) (in particular, the appropriate standards for differentiating between benefits and services that would be considered preventive care and those that would not be considered preventive care) and other issues related to the provision of preventive care under an HDHP.

Comments should include a reference to Notice 2018-12. Send submissions to CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2018-12), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, 54 Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR 

Monday, November 21, 2016

IRS Delays Employers’ Deadline to Distribute ACA Reporting Form 1095 to Employees

In a move that caught many in the benefits community by surprise, the IRS issued Notice 2016-70 on Nov. 18, giving employers subject to the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) 2016 information-reporting requirements up to an additional 30 days to deliver these forms to employees.
The notice affects upcoming deadlines for ACA information reporting as follows:
  • The IRS extended the deadline to deliver ACA reporting forms to employees from Jan. 31, 2017 to March 2. The extended deadline applies to furnishing to individuals the 2016Form 1095-C (Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage) and Form 1095-B(Health Coverage). 

    The Treasury Department and the IRS determined that a substantial number of employers and other insurance providers needed additional time "to gather and analyze the information [necessary to] prepare the 2016 Forms 1095-C and 1095-B to be furnished to individuals," Notice 2016-70 states.
  • This extension applies for tax year 2016 only, and does not require the submission of any request or other documentation to the IRS.
  • The IRS did not change the deadline for filing Forms 1094 and 1095 with the agency.This means there will be no extension to file the 2016 Form 1094-B (Transmittal of Health Coverage Information Returns) along with copies of Form 1095-B, and Form 1094-C(Transmittal of Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage Information Returns) along with copies of Form 1095-C.

    Employers filing these forms by mail will still need to do so by Feb. 28, 2017. Employers filing electronically (as those submitting 250 or more forms are required to do) must do so by March 31.
 Previous IRS Due DateNew IRS Due Date
Deadline to distribute ACA reporting forms to employees and covered individualsJan. 31, 2017March 2, 2017
Deadline to file ACA reporting forms with the IRS
Feb. 28, 2017 (paper)
March 31, 2017 (electronic)
No change
  • The IRS extended "good faith transition relief" for another year. In 2015, the IRS announced it would not penalize employers for incorrect or incomplete forms if they could show they made good-faith efforts to comply with the reporting requirements. No relief was available to employers who did not timely file the forms at all. Notice 2016-70 extends that good-faith relief to the 2016 reporting year. 

    The notice also clarified that the relief applies to "missing and inaccurate taxpayer identification numbers and dates of birth."
"The IRS announcement is welcome news to many employers still struggling to interpret and apply the IRS instructions to their reporting obligation," said Marcus Wilbers, a compliance attorney at benefits brokerage J.W. Terrill in St. Louis.
"This deadline was especially challenging because it coincided with Form 1099 and W2 processing schedules," said Mike Downey, executive vice president of BenefitScape, a Boston-based benefits services firm. "A 30-day extension, while short, moves the printing and distribution to a more opportune time."

A Second Year of Relief
Last December, the IRS gave employers subject to the ACA's 2015 information reporting requirements extra time to give these forms to employees and file them with the government. At that time, the IRS indicated it did not anticipate any additional extensions regarding ACA information reporting for future years.
Most employers and practitioners will now take advantage of the extended relief for distributing reporting forms to employees, Downey predicted.
Like last year, the guidance provides that employees can file their personal income taxes without having to attach the relevant Form 1095 to their tax returns. Taxpayers, however, should keep these forms with their other tax-year documents, as the IRS will request to view them if the taxpayer is audited.
ACA Reporting Is Still Required
Applicable large employers—those with 50 or more full-time or equivalent employees—are subject to the ACA's employer mandate and its related tracking and reporting requirements.
President-elect Donald Trump has made repealing and replacing the ACA a top priority, although the extent to which his administration and the GOP Congress can accomplish that goal is subject to debate. And while even short of full repeal the employer mandate is seen as a likely, early, target, "the ACA is still the law of the land," said Scott Behrens, an ERISA compliance attorney at Lockton Companies, a benefits brokerage based in Kansas City, Mo. "Prudent employers will want to continue to comply with the ACA, including the play-or-pay mandate and reporting requirements until formal guidance relieves them of those compliance obligations."
Small employers with fewer than 50 full-time employees are exempt from some, but not all, of the ACA's reporting requirements. For example, those with a self-insured health plan must complete and file Forms 1095-B and 1094-B with the IRS, as well as provide employees with a copy of Form 1095-B. Small employers also are required to file Forms 1095-C and 1094-C if they are members of a controlled or affiliated service group that collectively has at least 50 full-time employees.

Penalties Left Intact
Notwithstanding the extension, the IRS encouraged employers to furnish the 2016 statements as soon as they are able. Employers that do not meet the extended deadlines will remain subject to penalties.
"The IRS stated in Notice 2016-70 that it would apply a reasonable cause analysis when determining the penalty amount for a late filer," said Damian Myers, a benefits attorney with Proskauer in Washington, D.C.
"According to the IRS, this analysis will take into account such things as whether reasonable efforts were made to prepare for filing"—such as an employer's gathering and transmitting data to an agent or testing its own ability to transmit information to the IRS—"and the extent to which the filer is taking steps to ensure that it can comply with the reporting requirements for 2017," Myers noted
By Stephen Miller, CEBS
Nov 21, 2016



Wednesday, July 10, 2013

POSSIBLE DELAYS TO THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE UNDER TRANSITION RELIEF

According to IRS Notice 2013-42, for non-calendar year Medical Plans, transition relief is available for those plans that begin in 2013 and end in 2014.  If your coverage is available through an employer, depending upon when that coverage is made available to you (or your spouse) would depend upon when you would need to obtain coverage.

Example 1. You are eligible for enrollment in a non-calendar year employer sponsored medical plan beginning August 1, 2013 and ending July 31, 2014.  You have parent/child coverage for you and your 10-year old son.  You do not elect coverage for yourself/son on August 1, 2013.  Under this rule you would have transition relief through July 31, 2014.  If you do not elect coverage at this time, penalties would be assessed.

Example 2. You are Married and both you and your spouse are eligible for enrollment in a Non-Calendar Year Plan of an Employer for the 2013-2014 Plan Year and in a Calendar Year Plan with your Spouse’s Employer for 2014.  Your plan begins August 1, 2013 and ends July 31, 2014.  Your spouses plan begins January 1, 2014.  You do not elect coverage for you and your spouse under your plan August 1, 2013 and your spouse does not elect coverage for the both of you on January 1, 2014. In this example both you and your spouse would have transition relief until your plan renewal in August of 2014.  If at this time, no coverage was elected, penalties would be assessed.

(From IRS Notice 2013-42)